Home About us Contact | |||
Medical Speciality (medical + speciality)
Selected AbstractsDeliberate self-harm (DSH) among older people: a retrospective study in Barnet, North LondonINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, Issue 2 2005Florian Alexander Ruths Abstract Background Rates of suicide remain high among older people and those who deliberately self harm are believed to be at an increased risk of killing themselves in the future. If older people who deliberately harm themselves are to be helped by developments in services we need to understand what currently happens to them in terms of service provision and outcome. Methods A retrospective paper and electronic case note survey was carried out on all older people living in the London Borough of Barnet who presented to Accident & Emergency Departments with DSH over a two-year period. Ensuing actions and events were then tracked. Results Forty-three older people with DSH were identified. 18/43 (42%) had previous contact with local psychiatric services. The main method of DSH was overdose of medication (36/43 or 84%). Compared to the general population there were more women and widows. There were similar levels of physical ill-health. Thirty-seven of 43 (86%) received documented psychiatric input outside of hospital following the DSH. The mean follow-up period was 789.0 days (SD 419.8) and during this time 8/43 (19%) had a further documented episode of DSH, and 18/43 (40%) died from natural causes. Conclusions This study confirms the need for improved documentation of DSH and its coding; this needs to be reviewed at local and national level. The vast majority of older people who attempt suicide do have subsequent contact with psychiatric services. There is a strong likelihood of repeat DSH and a higher risk of death by natural causes, emphasising the need to conceptualise DSH as a risk factor relevant to all medical specialities. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Coxibs: evolution of prescription's behaviour in FranceFUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 3 2007Julie Biga Abstract The aim of the present study was, first to characterize profiles of coxibs' prescribers [general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists] in 2002 in France and, secondly, to identify factors associated with modification of this profile 1 year later. All GPs and rheumatologists from Midi-Pyrenees, Aquitaine, Languedoc-Roussillon and Pays de Loire areas (South of France: 11 050 000 inhabitants) were included in the study. For each practitioner, we used data concerning all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including coxibs reimbursed during period 1 (P1; January,March 2002) and period 2 (P2; January,March 2003). The ratio between the number of coxibs' prescriptions and the total number of NSAIDs' prescriptions (including coxibs) was used to define the two profiles of prescribers, one with a low level of coxibs' prescriptions and another one with a high level of coxibs' prescriptions. Characteristics of practitioners and characteristics of their practices were compared according to this profile. In the second step, we investigated the characteristics (of practitioners and practices) associated with an increase in the level of coxibs' prescriptions in P2 for practitioners with a low level of coxibs' prescriptions in P1. Results are expressed as odds ratio with their 95% confidence intervals. A positive statistical link was found between a high level of coxibs' prescriptions, the speciality of rheumatologist or extra costs for consultation. In contrast, a negative association was observed with female gender or age below 44 years. No relationship was found with the status of referent. Concerning practices' characteristics of practitioners, there was a positive statistical link between a high ratio of coxibs' prescriptions and high co-prescriptions of gastroprotective agents and a negative association with a high number of acts, a high proportion of patients with chronic disabling diseases (CDD) or a high number of patients between 15 and 64 years. There was no statistical link with proportion of patients covered by Universal Medical Coverage (UMC) or aged more than 65 years. Among the factors involved in the increase in the ratio (between P1 and P2), no relationship was found with practitioners' characteristics. In contrast, some factors related to practices (level of gastroprotective co-prescriptions, number of acts, number of CDD patients) were related to a change in coxibs' prescriptions between P1 and P2. This study allowed to discuss some relationships between coxibs' prescription and practitioners' (age, gender, medical speciality or extra costs for consultation) or practices' (level of medical practice, patients' age, number of CDD patients or level of gastroprotective prescriptions) characteristics. In contrast, some other factors like the referent status or the number of patients with UMC are not related. Physicians, initially low prescribers of coxibs and increasing their coxibs' prescriptions during the period of our study, were those with a high level of gastroprotective prescriptions, a low number of acts or a small proportion of CDD patients. [source] The impact of pressure ulcer risk assessment on patient outcomes among hospitalised patientsJOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, Issue 13 2009Mohammad Saleh Aims and objectives., To determine whether use of a risk assessment scale reduces nosocomial pressure ulcers. Background., There is contradictory evidence concerning the validity of risk assessment scales. The interaction of education, clinical judgement and use of risk assessment scales has not been fully explored. It is not known which of these is most important, nor whether combining them results in better patient care. Design., Pretest,posttest comparison. Methods., A risk assessment scale namely the Braden was implemented in a group of wards after appropriate education and training of staff in addition to mandatory wound care study days. Another group of staff received the same education programme but did not implement the risk assessment scale and a third group carried on with mandatory study days only. Results., Nosocomial Pressure Ulcer was reduced in all three groups, but the group that implemented the risk assessment scale showed no significant additional improvement. Allowing for age, gender, medical speciality, level of risk and other factors did not explain this lack of improvement. Clinical judgement seemed to be used by nurses to identify patients at high risk to implement appropriate risk reduction strategies such as use of pressure relieving beds. Clinical judgement was not significantly different from the risk assessment scale score in terms of risk evaluation. Conclusions., It is questioned whether the routine use of a risk assessment scale is useful in reducing nosocomial pressure ulcer. It is suggested clinical judgement is as effective as a risk assessment scale in terms of assessing risk (though neither show good sensitivity and specificity) and determining appropriate care. Relevance to clinical practice., Clinical judgement may be as effective as employing a risk assessment scale to assess the risk of pressure ulcers. If this were true it would be simpler and release nursing time for other tasks. [source] ,I WILL NOT CUT . . . ': THE OATH THAT DEFINED UROLOGYBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 7 2008Harry W. Herr OBJECTIVE To explore different interpretations of the clause embedded in the Hippocratic Oath, prohibiting surgery for stones, and its relevance for urology. METHODS Various translations of the Oath, from the original Greek edition to historical revisions, were reviewed. RESULTS Controversy surrounds different translations and interpretations of the Oath about the practice of lithotomy among ancient healers. The reasons Hippocratic physicians were prohibited from performing lithotomy are several, but the consensus is that untrained physicians pledged not to undertake such a complicated procedure, but to refer their patients to other healers who specialized in that practice. CONCLUSION The Hippocratic Oath actually defined, identified and legitimized urology as the first medical speciality. [source] |