			Home About us Contact

Chest Pain Syndrome (chest + pain_syndrome)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Rapid Disposition of Low-risk Emergency Department Patients with Chest Pain Syndromes

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 2 2007
Judd E. Hollander MD
Background Patients with recent normal cardiac catheterization are at low risk for complications of ischemic chest pain. Computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography has high correlation with cardiac catheterization for detection of coronary stenosis. Therefore, the investigators' emergency department (ED) incorporated CT coronary angiography into the evaluation of low-risk patients with chest pain. Objectives To report on the 30-day cardiovascular event rates of the first 54 patients evaluated by this strategy. Methods Low-risk chest pain patients (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] score of 2 or less) without acute ischemia on an electrocardiogram had CT coronary angiography performed in the ED. If the CT coronary angiography was negative, the patient was discharged home. The main outcomes were death and myocardial infarction within 30 days of ED discharge, as determined by telephone follow up and record review. Data are presented as percentage frequency of occurrence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Of the 54 patients evaluated, after CT coronary angiography, 46 patients (85%) were immediately released from the ED, and none had cardiovascular complications within 30 days. Eight patients were admitted after CT coronary angiography: one had >70% stenosis, five patients had 50%,69% stenosis, and two had 0,49% stenosis. Three patients had further noninvasive testing; one had reversible ischemia, and catheterization confirmed the results of CT coronary angiography. All patients were followed for 30 days, and none (0; 95% CI = 0 to 6.6%) had an adverse event during index hospitalization or at 30-day follow up. Conclusions When used in the clinical setting for the evaluation of ED patients with low-risk chest pain, CT coronary angiography may safely allow rapid discharge of patients with negative studies. Further study to conclusively determine the safety and cost effectiveness of this approach is warranted. [source]

Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with Optison Contrast

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 6 2002
Jagruti Patel M.D.
We describe a case of obstructive apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a 61-year-old Caucasian female with a history of chest pain syndrome. The patient was referred to the echo lab by her nuclear cardiologist, who was impressed by her abnormal stress nuclear perfusion scan that showed marked increased uptake of radioisotope at the left ventricular (LV) apex. The patient had deep negative T waves on her electrocardiogram similar to those originally described in the Japanese population. Transthoracic echocardiography with native harmonic imaging was suboptimal for visualizing LV segments. Therefore, 0.5 cc of Optison contrast was given intravenously, with repeat transthoracic imaging confirming the diagnosis. The patient and her family were referred for additional genetic testing and cardiovascular workup. [source]

The Association Between Emergency Department Crowding and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Chest Pain

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 7 2009
Jesse M. Pines MD
Abstract Objectives:, While emergency department (ED) crowding is a worldwide problem, few studies have demonstrated associations between crowding and outcomes. The authors examined whether ED crowding was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain syndromes (chest pain or related complaints of possible cardiac origin). Methods:, A retrospective analysis was performed for patients ,30 years of age with chest pain syndrome admitted to a tertiary care academic hospital from 1999 through 2006. The authors compared rates of inpatient adverse outcomes from ED triage to hospital discharge, defined as delayed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and cardiac arrest, which occurred after ED arrival using five separate crowding measures. Results:, Among 4,574 patients, 251 (4%) patients developed adverse outcomes after ED arrival; 803 (18%) had documented acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and of those, 273 (34%) had AMI. Compared to less crowded times, ACS patients experienced more adverse outcomes at the highest waiting room census (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 11.0) and patient-hours (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.0 to 13.6) and trended toward more adverse outcomes during time of high ED occupancy (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.0 to 9.3). Adverse outcomes were not significantly more frequent during times with the highest number of admitted patients (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.6 to 4.1) or the highest trailing mean length of stay (LOS) for admitted patients transferred to inpatient beds within 6 hours (OR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.5 to 4.0). Patients with non-ACS chest pain experienced more adverse outcomes during the highest waiting room census (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.4 to 8.4) and patient-hours (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 2.6 to 7.3), but not occupancy (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 0.9 to 3.3), number of admitted patients (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.1), or trailing LOS for admitted patients (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.6 to 2.0). Conclusions:, There was an association between some measures of ED crowding and a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with both ACS-related and non,ACS-related chest pain syndrome. [source]

Methodological Analysis of Diagnostic Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Studies

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Issue 8 2004
Boudewijn J. Krenning M.D.
Background: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is an accepted test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), despite its wide diagnostic accuracy. Aim: Which factors cause test variability of DSE for the diagnosis of CAD. Methods: In a retrospective analysis of 46 studies in 5,353 patients, the potential causes of diagnostic variability were systematically analyzed, including patient selection, definition of CAD, chest pain characteristics, confounding factors for DSE (left ventricular hypertrophy, left bundle branch block, female gender), work-up bias (present when patient's chance to undergo coronary angiography is influenced by the result of DSE), review bias (present when DSE is interpreted in relation to CAG), DSE protocol and definition of a positive DSE. Results: Diagnostic variability was related to definition of a positive test, but not related to the definition of CAD or DSE protocol. However, only three of eight methodological standards for research design found general compliance. Differences in the selection of the study population (quality of echocardiographic window, angina pectoris), handling of confounding factors and analysis of disease in individual coronary arteries were observed. Lack of data on analysis of relevant chest pain syndromes and handling of nondiagnostic test results hampered further evaluation of these standards. Conclusion: Methodological problems may explain the wide range in diagnostic variability of DSE. An improvement of clinical relevance of DSE testing is possible by stronger adherence to common and new methodological standards. [source]